The Genre Generation.

Scuttlebutt has it that there’s some writerly “advice” afloat, to the effect that authors should stick to writing in only one genre. I’ve heard this little gem from different bloggers, but I don’t know who originated it, nor do I know why it’s been promulgated – although one rumor is that it’s to keep from upsetting and losing readers.

If that’s true, then this counsel smacks of ivory tower contempt of the worst kind: that which is founded on utter ignorance. What reader would be so immature as to resent and retaliate against an author just for writing something different? A book that one reader doesn’t care for, another will probably like. And whereas only the first sale of a copy of a book provides pocket money for authors, their heirs or assigns, the used book market is still thriving (I’ve dropped a chunk or two of change there, myself).

It never bothered me that Zane Grey wrote stuff other than cowboy stories. I didn’t care much for his fishing anecdotes or his sport shorts, or even his south seas island adventure novel, but I still own most of what he wrote – purchases that undoubtedly helped keep his estate in the black. I rather doubt that genre-hopping was (or ever will be), the motive for the Bonfire of the Vanities or any other book burnings.

bookburningI bring this up, because some bloggers who’ve mentioned this seemed to be perplexed or even troubled by it. They’ve conceived of tales that are outside of their usual genre, and they want to tell these stories, but some are afraid to do so, and others are wary of publishing output that they’ve been led to believe was irresponsible for them to have produced. You’d almost think that genre-switching is a criminal waste of creative energy.

I have news for closet creativity criminals: creativity is not a zero-sum game. There’s always room for more, and for more variety. Changing genre is not illegal, immoral or unethical, and we don’t need to beat ourselves up about it. Any genre quota police we may encounter are self-appointed, so we can just thumb our noses at them, and go on our happy genre-hopping ways.

eyes under bedWriters have enough monsters under the bed, to worry about – such as labeling their work with a genre, to begin with. There’s all kinds of Sturm und Drang about this, as Tara Sparling recently pointed out in another of her perspicacious posts. Some genres seem to be stereotypical. Others are just inadequate for the job. But writers are forced to brand their books with these stigmata – in the form of Book Industry Standards and Communications (BISAC) codes – for fear of inadequate “discoverability.”

It occurred to me that a generation or so ago, it didn’t seem to be all that hard to find books, even if they did lack UPCs, ISBNs and the infamous BISACs. Then, being the noseypoker that I am, I wondered who was the mastermind behind the BISAC system. It happens to be the Book Industry Study Group (BISG). Apparently, a few publishing, manufacturing and marketing gurus got together over lunch during a trade show in 1975, and decided that they didn’t like having to use the Dewey Decimal System while conducting research. Hey, presto – the BISG was born, trailing clouds of glorious BISAC codes (apologies to William Wordsworth).*

Melvil_Dewey_1891Now, why Dewey should have been deemed inadequate for categorizing books, when it’s as infinitely divisible as a number line, escapes me. But, in general, that’s why we ended up with BISAC codes, which not only have to be emblazoned on the back cover of every book, but which also get revised every year – and that means the “discoverability” you thought you had clinched, is still likely to go the way of the dodo.

After all the hate and discontent of sorting out your work’s genre, isn’t it nice to know that your book may be bound for the Bermuda Triangle, anyway? “Discoverability,” thy name is Area 51. Well, at least Elvis and JFK will have plenty to read.

* The organization says its membership includes “publishers, booksellers, manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, libraries, trade associations, and others.” In addition to the businesses, there are a number of individuals (occupations not stated) on its membership list. They must be the “others,” because leaving aside the “Authors Guild,” membership of identified writers seems to be a bit thin on the ground.

Advertisements

9 Comments

Filed under Fiction, Literature, Novels, Uncategorized, Writing

9 responses to “The Genre Generation.

  1. I really don’t like this advice, I saw it around when I first thought of becoming a self-published author.

    I think you should be able to write what you want to, if that means one book is sci-fi and another is thriller. Writing is a passion, and shouldn’t be confined! 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  2. That such advice exists is prime material for an anti-indie conspiracy theory. It belongs in the dustbin of history, along with medieval guilds, serfdom, and male primogeniture.

    Like

  3. Ha…thanks for that! You really made me laugh. Why anyone would think genre-hopping would be an issue is beyond me…I mean, don’t they READ? All the major authors out there in trad-publand have been doing it for YEARS! Dipping their toes in the puddles of writing for adults children YA, skipping between fiction and non-fiction, etc. Its got to be better for the Indie, increasing their opportunity to be found by a whole new audience…wheres the problem in that?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. All I want to do is tell my stories. I don’t care what genre they fit into.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. RAM

    Great article – I am wrestling with the same question at the moment. The story you were so kind to have commented on is not at all what I usually write, so I’m not quite sure what to do with it. Thanks for the prod.

    Liked by 1 person

Light A Fire Here:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s